linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] watchdog: add watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 5 Apr 2015 12:46:47 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
To:	cmetcalf@...hip.com
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
	chai wen <chaiw.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
	Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
	Ben Zhang <benzh@...omium.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] watchdog: add watchdog_exclude sysctl to assist
 nohz


Chris,

I'd like to comment on the following proposed change:

+int proc_dowatchdog_exclude(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+                            void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+        int err;
+
+        mutex_lock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
+        err = proc_do_large_bitmap(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+        if (!err && write && watchdog_user_enabled) {
+                watchdog_disable_all_cpus();
+                watchdog_enable_all_cpus(false);
+        }
+        mutex_unlock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
+        return err;
+}

The watchdog mechanism is enabled if watchdog_user_enabled and watchdog_thresh
are both non-zero. Hence, I think the if-statement in the above snippet of code
should look like this:

         if (!err && write && watchdog_user_enabled && watchdog_thresh)

Please see proc_dowatchdog() which checks the content of both variables before
it calls watchdog_enable_all_cpus():

  https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/watchdog.c?id=refs/tags/v4.0-rc6#n682


For completeness, I'd also like to point out that if the patch series at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/5/626 gets accepted upstream, the if-statement
will have to be adjusted. I think it should then look like this:

         if (!err && write && watchdog_enabled && watchdog_thresh) {
                 watchdog_disable_all_cpus();
                 watchdog_enable_all_cpus();
         }

Please see proc_watchdog_update() here which is similar to the above.

  https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/kernel/watchdog.c?id=refs/tags/next-20150402#n710


Regards,

Uli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/