linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/10] iommu/vt-d: Fix intel vt-d faults in kdump kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 5 Apr 2015 09:54:53 +0800
From:	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@...com>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, joro@...tes.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	alex.williamson@...hat.com, ddutile@...hat.com,
	ishii.hironobu@...fujitsu.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	doug.hatch@...com, jerry.hoemann@...com, tom.vaden@...com,
	li.zhang6@...com, lisa.mitchell@...com, billsumnerlinux@...il.com,
	rwright@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/10] iommu/vt-d: Fix intel vt-d faults in kdump kernel

On 04/03/15 at 05:21pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/03/15 at 05:01pm, Li, ZhenHua wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > There may be some possibilities that the old iommu data is corrupted by
> > some other modules. Currently we do not have a better solution for the
> > dmar faults.
> > 
> > But I think when this happens, we need to fix the module that corrupted
> > the old iommu data. I once met a similar problem in normal kernel, the
> > queue used by the qi_* functions was written again by another module.
> > The fix was in that module, not in iommu module.
> 
> It is too late, there will be no chance to save vmcore then.
> 
> Also if it is possible to continue corrupt other area of oldmem because
> of using old iommu tables then it will cause more problems.
> 
> So I think the tables at least need some verifycation before being used.
> 

Yes, it's a good thinking anout this and verification is also an
interesting idea. kexec/kdump do a sha256 calculation on loaded kernel
and then verify this again when panic happens in purgatory. This checks
whether any code stomps into region reserved for kexec/kernel and corrupt
the loaded kernel.

If this is decided to do it should be an enhancement to current
patchset but not a approach change. Since this patchset is going very
close to point as maintainers expected maybe this can be merged firstly,
then think about enhancement. After all without this patchset vt-d often
raised error message, hung.

By the way I tested this patchset it works very well on my HP z420 work
station.

Thanks
Baoquan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/