[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150406130045.GA18583@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:00:46 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dm-crypt: Adds support for wiping key when doing
suspend/hibernation
On Sun, Apr 05 2015 at 1:20pm -0400,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch series increase security of suspend and hibernate actions. It allows
> user to safely wipe crypto keys before suspend and hibernate actions starts
> without race conditions on userspace process with heavy I/O.
>
> To automatically wipe cryto key for <device> before hibernate action call:
> $ dmsetup message <device> 0 key wipe_on_hibernation 1
>
> To automatically wipe cryto key for <device> before suspend action call:
> $ dmsetup message <device> 0 key wipe_on_suspend 1
>
> (Value 0 after wipe_* string reverts original behaviour - to not wipe key)
Can you elaborate on the attack vector your changes are meant to protect
against? The user already authorized access, why is it inherently
dangerous to _not_ wipe the associated key across these events?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists