linux-kernel - Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the non-standard protected e820 type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150406155554.GA24266@lst.de>
Date:	Mon, 6 Apr 2015 17:55:54 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the
	non-standard protected e820 type

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:12:39AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > Should we also delete this code, accounting E820_PRAM as ram, along with
> > the deletion of reserve_pmem() in this version?
> 
> should revert those end_of_ram change as attached.

This works fine for me:

Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>


> -static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
> +static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type)

But I'd prefer not to re-add the argument here, it only obsfucates the
code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/