[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150406165154.GP6023@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 17:51:54 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Refactor Qualcomm RPM regulator to single
platform_device
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 03:57:16PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/02/15 15:26, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Guenther sent a patch fixing that a while back.
> This one?
Yes.
> regulator: Ensure unique regulator debugfs directory names
> Ok. Seems to be only in next. I'm not sure it will work though because
> in this case the parent device is the same for both regulators on
> different PMICs that the RPM is controlling. I could be wrong though
> because I haven't tested it.
I'd say that if the driver is doing this then the driver is buggy - the
user should be able to distinguish between two regulators appearing for
the same device. Either the RPM should create dummy devices for the two
PMICs or something should insert the PMIC name into the regulator name
somewhere along the line (perhaps in the static data).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists