[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150406113950.3ebfa694@icelake>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 11:39:50 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: IIO <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio/axp288_adc: add missing channel info mask
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:07:03 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> > - .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED),
> > + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED)
> > + | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> > },
> These cases strike me as problematic. You should not need both. If
> the consumer is reading _raw from a channel that only supplies
> PROCESSED then that is the bug, not the lack of support for a raw
> read.
> > };
Very sorry about the delay, you are right that we should just need RAW.
V2 patch just sent.
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists