linux-kernel - [PATCH 46/49] writeback: dirty inodes against their matching cgroup bdi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1428350318-8215-47-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon,  6 Apr 2015 15:58:35 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, hch@...radead.org,
	hannes@...xchg.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	vgoyal@...hat.com, lizefan@...wei.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.cz, clm@...com,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com, david@...morbit.com, gthelen@...gle.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 46/49] writeback: dirty inodes against their matching cgroup bdi_writeback's

__mark_inode_dirty() always dirtied the inode against the root wb
(bdi_writeback).  The previous patches added all the infrastructure
necessary to attribute an inode against the wb of the dirtying cgroup.

This patch updates __mark_inode_dirty() so that it uses the wb
associated with the inode instead of unconditionally using the root
one.

Currently, none of the filesystems has FS_CGROUP_WRITEBACK and all
pages will keep being dirtied against the root wb.

v2: Updated for per-inode wb association.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 9f42c14..2b9c82b 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1432,7 +1432,6 @@ static noinline void block_dump___mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode)
 void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
 {
 	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
-	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = NULL;
 	int dirtytime;
 
 	trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty(inode, flags);
@@ -1502,21 +1501,21 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
 		 * reposition it (that would break b_dirty time-ordering).
 		 */
 		if (!was_dirty) {
+			struct bdi_writeback *wb = inode_to_wb(inode);
 			bool wakeup_bdi = false;
-			bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
 
 			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-			spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
+			spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
 
-			WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) &&
-			     !test_bit(WB_registered, &bdi->wb.state),
-			     "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name);
+			WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(wb->bdi) &&
+			     !test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state),
+			     "bdi-%s not registered\n", wb->bdi->name);
 
 			inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
-			wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, &bdi->wb,
-					dirtytime ? &bdi->wb.b_dirty_time :
-						    &bdi->wb.b_dirty);
-			spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
+			wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, wb,
+					dirtytime ? &wb->b_dirty_time :
+						    &wb->b_dirty);
+			spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
 			trace_writeback_dirty_inode_enqueue(inode);
 
 			/*
@@ -1525,8 +1524,8 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
 			 * to make sure background write-back happens
 			 * later.
 			 */
-			if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) && wakeup_bdi)
-				wb_wakeup_delayed(&bdi->wb);
+			if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(wb->bdi) && wakeup_bdi)
+				wb_wakeup_delayed(wb);
 			return;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/