linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] pinctrl: Add driver for Alphascale asm9260 pinctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <552255C6.1050503@rempel-privat.de>
Date:	Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:45:42 +0200
From:	Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC:	linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] pinctrl: Add driver for Alphascale asm9260 pinctrl

Am 06.04.2015 um 11:41 schrieb Paul Bolle:
> On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 10:38 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> If you won't to say: "You have a mismatch between header and
>> MODULE_LICENSE, please make sure it will match."
>> You saying some thing like this: "I was right last time. Make module
>> License like I saying."
> 
> No, that's not what I wrote.
>
>> I'm confuse, what is your actual point? Do you trying to prove some thing?
> 
> My point is that there's a mismatch between the license described in the
> comment at the top of this file and the ident used in the
> MODULE_LICENSE() macro. In my comments on v2 I wrote:
>     By the way, you probably want to use "GPL v2" as the license ident
>     [...].
> 
> In this v3 I noticed the same mismatch (which was not surprising because
> you already stated that "GPL" actually did match what's stated at the
> comment in the top of this file). Therefor I wrote:
>     So only "GPL v2" matches what's found in the comment at top of this
>     file.
> 
> There now seem to be a few options:
> - change either the comment at the top of this file or the license ident
> used in MODULE_LICENSE() to make them actually match;
> - show that I misread the comment at top of this file;
> - or show that my reading of module.h is incorrect.

Ok, thank you for your review.

i send new version of patch with fixing header license to "v2 and later".


> (Another option would be a patch that somehow merges the "GPL" and "GPL
> v2" license idents. That patch would put an end to discussions like the
> one we're having here. I'm _not_ volunteering to submit it.)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Paul Bolle
> 


-- 
Regards,
Oleksij


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (231 bytes)