[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55246337.2000804@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:07:35 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Pramod Gurav <gpramod@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bryanh@...eaurora.org, jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Fix mask value of RFR level
On 04/07/15 06:47, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> According to documents The RFR_LEVEL1 in UART_DM_MR1 can be
That is UART_DM_MR1
> programmed in bits 31:8 but the masks only bits 17:8.
> Correct the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <gpramod@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> index 8f7806d..5ff9ebf 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> #define UART_MR1 0x0000
>
> #define UART_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL0 0x3F
> -#define UART_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL1 0x3FF00
> +#define UART_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL1 0xFFFFFF00
But this is UART_MR1. The two hardware cores share the same driver
because the DM hardware is based on the non-DM hardware. I suppose we
need to make another #define UART_DM_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL1 and then have
an if (msm_port->is_uartdm) in msm_startup() path to handle the
differences here.
> #define UART_MR1_RX_RDY_CTL (1 << 7)
> #define UART_MR1_CTS_CTL (1 << 6)
>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists