linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: use __noreturn instead of directly __attribute_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2015 15:17:14 +0600
From:	Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: use __noreturn instead of directly
 __attribute__ definition

Hello Ingo and Borislav,

2015-04-07 14:56 GMT+06:00 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:35:27AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> My advice to you is to try to raise beyond newbie patches and write
>> something more substantial that helps Linux:
>
> Yeah, I tried:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150228134832.GB11038@pd.tnic
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150305181755.GL3915@pd.tnic

That's true.

>
> My suggestions and genuine desire to help were a pure waste of time.

No, it weren't. It was my last trivial patch and until I'll start to
do that - useful.
I really don't want to waste time of community on trifles.

Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/