lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1563564450.13405921.1428411620019.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:00:20 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tile
 tree


Stephen,

the if-statement in proc_dowatchdog_exclude() does not look correct to me.
Please see my comments in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/5/119 for details.
Chris posted v5 of his patch in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/6/255.

Regards,

Uli


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Chris Metcalf" <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Ulrich Obergfell" <uobergfe@...hat.com>, "Don Zickus" <dzickus@...hat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 1:21:53 PM
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tile tree

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
kernel/watchdog.c between commit e164ade07b21 ("watchdog: add
watchdog_exclude sysctl to assist nohz") from the tile tree and commits
e0afaab242da ("watchdog: introduce separate handlers for parameters
in /proc/sys/kernel"), 866d62a433cc ("watchdog: enable the new user
interface of the watchdog mechanism") and 09d1b2261fcc ("watchdog:
clean up some function names and arguments") from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (see below, but it may need more work) and can carry the
fix as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc kernel/watchdog.c
index 083bd9007b3e,f2be11ab7e08..000000000000
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@@ -656,90 -693,160 +696,191 @@@ static void watchdog_disable_all_cpus(v
  	}
  }
  
 +static DEFINE_MUTEX(watchdog_proc_mutex);
 +
  /*
-  * proc handler for /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog,watchdog_thresh
+  * Update the run state of the lockup detectors.
   */
+ static int proc_watchdog_update(void)
+ {
+ 	int err = 0;
+ 
+ 	/*
+ 	 * Watchdog threads won't be started if they are already active.
+ 	 * The 'watchdog_running' variable in watchdog_*_all_cpus() takes
+ 	 * care of this. If those threads are already active, the sample
+ 	 * period will be updated and the lockup detectors will be enabled
+ 	 * or disabled 'on the fly'.
+ 	 */
+ 	if (watchdog_enabled && watchdog_thresh)
+ 		err = watchdog_enable_all_cpus();
+ 	else
+ 		watchdog_disable_all_cpus();
+ 
+ 	return err;
+ 
+ }
+ 
+ static DEFINE_MUTEX(watchdog_proc_mutex);
  
- int proc_dowatchdog(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
- 		    void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+ /*
+  * common function for watchdog, nmi_watchdog and soft_watchdog parameter
+  *
+  * caller             | table->data points to | 'which' contains the flag(s)
+  * -------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------
+  * proc_watchdog      | watchdog_user_enabled | NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED or'ed
+  *                    |                       | with SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED
+  * -------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------
+  * proc_nmi_watchdog  | nmi_watchdog_enabled  | NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED
+  * -------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------
+  * proc_soft_watchdog | soft_watchdog_enabled | SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED
+  */
+ static int proc_watchdog_common(int which, struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+ 				void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
  {
- 	int err, old_thresh, old_enabled;
- 	bool old_hardlockup;
+ 	int err, old, new;
+ 	int *watchdog_param = (int *)table->data;
  
  	mutex_lock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
- 	old_thresh = ACCESS_ONCE(watchdog_thresh);
- 	old_enabled = ACCESS_ONCE(watchdog_user_enabled);
- 	old_hardlockup = watchdog_hardlockup_detector_is_enabled();
  
- 	err = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
- 	if (err || !write)
- 		goto out;
- 
- 	set_sample_period();
  	/*
- 	 * Watchdog threads shouldn't be enabled if they are
- 	 * disabled. The 'watchdog_running' variable check in
- 	 * watchdog_*_all_cpus() function takes care of this.
+ 	 * If the parameter is being read return the state of the corresponding
+ 	 * bit(s) in 'watchdog_enabled', else update 'watchdog_enabled' and the
+ 	 * run state of the lockup detectors.
  	 */
- 	if (watchdog_user_enabled && watchdog_thresh) {
+ 	if (!write) {
+ 		*watchdog_param = (watchdog_enabled & which) != 0;
+ 		err = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ 	} else {
+ 		err = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ 		if (err)
+ 			goto out;
+ 
  		/*
- 		 * Prevent a change in watchdog_thresh accidentally overriding
- 		 * the enablement of the hardlockup detector.
+ 		 * There is a race window between fetching the current value
+ 		 * from 'watchdog_enabled' and storing the new value. During
+ 		 * this race window, watchdog_nmi_enable() can sneak in and
+ 		 * clear the NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED bit in 'watchdog_enabled'.
+ 		 * The 'cmpxchg' detects this race and the loop retries.
  		 */
- 		if (watchdog_user_enabled != old_enabled)
- 			watchdog_enable_hardlockup_detector(true);
- 		err = watchdog_enable_all_cpus(old_thresh != watchdog_thresh);
- 	} else
- 		watchdog_disable_all_cpus();
+ 		do {
+ 			old = watchdog_enabled;
+ 			/*
+ 			 * If the parameter value is not zero set the
+ 			 * corresponding bit(s), else clear it(them).
+ 			 */
+ 			if (*watchdog_param)
+ 				new = old | which;
+ 			else
+ 				new = old & ~which;
+ 		} while (cmpxchg(&watchdog_enabled, old, new) != old);
  
- 	/* Restore old values on failure */
- 	if (err) {
- 		watchdog_thresh = old_thresh;
- 		watchdog_user_enabled = old_enabled;
- 		watchdog_enable_hardlockup_detector(old_hardlockup);
+ 		/*
+ 		 * Update the run state of the lockup detectors.
+ 		 * Restore 'watchdog_enabled' on failure.
+ 		 */
+ 		err = proc_watchdog_update();
+ 		if (err)
+ 			watchdog_enabled = old;
  	}
  out:
  	mutex_unlock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
  	return err;
  }
  
 +int proc_dowatchdog_exclude(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 +			    void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
 +{
 +	int err;
 +
 +	mutex_lock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
 +	err = proc_do_large_bitmap(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
 +	if (!err && write && watchdog_user_enabled) {
 +		watchdog_disable_all_cpus();
- 		watchdog_enable_all_cpus(false);
++		watchdog_enable_all_cpus();
 +	}
 +	mutex_unlock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
 +	return err;
 +}
 +
+ /*
+  * /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog
+  */
+ int proc_watchdog(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+ 		  void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+ {
+ 	return proc_watchdog_common(NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED|SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED,
+ 				    table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ }
+ 
+ /*
+  * /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
+  */
+ int proc_nmi_watchdog(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+ 		      void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+ {
+ 	return proc_watchdog_common(NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED,
+ 				    table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ }
+ 
+ /*
+  * /proc/sys/kernel/soft_watchdog
+  */
+ int proc_soft_watchdog(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+ 			void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+ {
+ 	return proc_watchdog_common(SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED,
+ 				    table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ }
+ 
+ /*
+  * /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh
+  */
+ int proc_watchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+ 			 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+ {
+ 	int err, old;
+ 
+ 	mutex_lock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
+ 
+ 	old = ACCESS_ONCE(watchdog_thresh);
+ 	err = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ 
+ 	if (err || !write)
+ 		goto out;
+ 
+ 	/*
+ 	 * Update the sample period.
+ 	 * Restore 'watchdog_thresh' on failure.
+ 	 */
+ 	set_sample_period();
+ 	err = proc_watchdog_update();
+ 	if (err)
+ 		watchdog_thresh = old;
+ out:
+ 	mutex_unlock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
+ 	return err;
+ }
  #endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
  
  void __init lockup_detector_init(void)
  {
  	set_sample_period();
  
 +	alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&watchdog_exclude_mask);
 +	watchdog_threads.exclude_mask = watchdog_exclude_mask;
 +
 +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
 +	if (!cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
 +		pr_info("Disabling watchdog on nohz_full cores by default\n");
 +	cpumask_copy(watchdog_exclude_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
 +#else
 +	cpumask_clear(watchdog_exclude_mask);
 +#endif
 +
 +	/* The sysctl API requires a variable holding a pointer to the mask. */
 +	watchdog_exclude_mask_bits = cpumask_bits(watchdog_exclude_mask);
 +
- 	if (watchdog_user_enabled)
- 		watchdog_enable_all_cpus(false);
+ 	if (watchdog_enabled)
+ 		watchdog_enable_all_cpus();
  }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ