[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <63a36d180e5a2193bc35f02a2e4bafe009ca48fd.1428411004.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:50:41 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Ilias Tsitsimpis <i.tsitsimpis@...il.com>,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 072/155] target: Allow AllRegistrants to re-RESERVE existing reservation
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit ae450e246e8540300699480a3780a420a028b73f upstream.
This patch changes core_scsi3_pro_release() logic to allow an
existing AllRegistrants type reservation to be re-reserved by
any registered I_T nexus.
This addresses a issue where AllRegistrants type RESERVE was
receiving RESERVATION_CONFLICT status if dev_pr_res_holder did
not match the same I_T nexus, instead of just returning GOOD
status following spc4r34 Section 5.9.9:
"If the device server receives a PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT command
with RESERVE service action where the TYPE field and the SCOPE
field contain the same values as the existing type and scope
from a persistent reservation holder, it shall not make any
change to the existing persistent reservation and shall complete
the command with GOOD status."
Reported-by: Ilias Tsitsimpis <i.tsitsimpis@...il.com>
Cc: Ilias Tsitsimpis <i.tsitsimpis@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
drivers/target/target_core_pr.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
index 13a4836765ea..98e2f02b48f6 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
@@ -2297,6 +2297,7 @@ core_scsi3_pro_reserve(struct se_cmd *cmd, int type, int scope, u64 res_key)
spin_lock(&dev->dev_reservation_lock);
pr_res_holder = dev->dev_pr_res_holder;
if (pr_res_holder) {
+ int pr_res_type = pr_res_holder->pr_res_type;
/*
* From spc4r17 Section 5.7.9: Reserving:
*
@@ -2307,7 +2308,9 @@ core_scsi3_pro_reserve(struct se_cmd *cmd, int type, int scope, u64 res_key)
* the logical unit, then the command shall be completed with
* RESERVATION CONFLICT status.
*/
- if (pr_res_holder != pr_reg) {
+ if ((pr_res_holder != pr_reg) &&
+ (pr_res_type != PR_TYPE_WRITE_EXCLUSIVE_ALLREG) &&
+ (pr_res_type != PR_TYPE_EXCLUSIVE_ACCESS_ALLREG)) {
struct se_node_acl *pr_res_nacl = pr_res_holder->pr_reg_nacl;
pr_err("SPC-3 PR: Attempted RESERVE from"
" [%s]: %s while reservation already held by"
--
2.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists