linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 013/155] sparc32: destroy_context() and switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <0e11fbaf7e1a56a908e119003dda272c8f547fa3.1428411003.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Tue,  7 Apr 2015 14:49:42 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 013/155] sparc32: destroy_context() and switch_mm() needs to disable interrupts.

From: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

[ Upstream commit 66d0f7ec9f1038452178b1993fc07fd96d30fd38 ]

Load balancing can be triggered in the critical sections protected by
srmmu_context_spinlock in destroy_context() and switch_mm() and can hang
the cpu waiting for the rq lock of another cpu that in turn has called
switch_mm hangning on srmmu_context_spinlock leading to deadlock.

So, disable interrupt while taking srmmu_context_spinlock in
destroy_context() and switch_mm() so we don't deadlock.

See also commit 77b838fa1ef0 ("[SPARC64]: destroy_context() needs to disable
interrupts.")

Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
index 5d721df48a72..1e0e7d2837da 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
@@ -455,10 +455,12 @@ static void __init sparc_context_init(int numctx)
 void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *old_mm, struct mm_struct *mm,
 	       struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
+
 	if (mm->context == NO_CONTEXT) {
-		spin_lock(&srmmu_context_spinlock);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&srmmu_context_spinlock, flags);
 		alloc_context(old_mm, mm);
-		spin_unlock(&srmmu_context_spinlock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&srmmu_context_spinlock, flags);
 		srmmu_ctxd_set(&srmmu_context_table[mm->context], mm->pgd);
 	}
 
@@ -983,14 +985,15 @@ int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
 
 void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (mm->context != NO_CONTEXT) {
 		flush_cache_mm(mm);
 		srmmu_ctxd_set(&srmmu_context_table[mm->context], srmmu_swapper_pg_dir);
 		flush_tlb_mm(mm);
-		spin_lock(&srmmu_context_spinlock);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&srmmu_context_spinlock, flags);
 		free_context(mm->context);
-		spin_unlock(&srmmu_context_spinlock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&srmmu_context_spinlock, flags);
 		mm->context = NO_CONTEXT;
 	}
 }
-- 
2.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/