[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5523E006.4050507@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:47:50 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Drop debugging leftover trace_printk call
On 03/04/2015 09:42, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>
> Commit
>
> 3c18d447b3b3 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in cpuset_cpu_inactive()")
>
> forgot a trace_printk debugging piece in and Steve's banner blew in
> dmesg. Remove it.
>
Argh! Sorry about that! Shame on me, I didn't pay much attention to
Rostedt's banner because I was working on several fixes at once :(.
Anyway, how about we add also something like this to checkpatch?
(I'll add appropriate CCs if this makes sense).
Thanks,
- Juri
>From e5733b377d55fd760160fa0e7822bdefa4f3a2c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 09:57:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch: check for uses of trace_printk
Production kernels will scream if trace_printk() is used (thanks to
Rostedt's banner). Rather than waiting for that to happen, let's check
patches beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index d124359..1fc454c5 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3257,6 +3257,12 @@ sub process {
"Prefer printk_ratelimited or pr_<level>_ratelimited to printk_ratelimit\n" . $herecurr);
}
+# check for uses of trace_printk
+ if ($line =~ /\btrace_printk\s*\(/) {
+ ERROR("TRACE_PRINTK",
+ "Never use trace_printk in production code!\n" . $herecurr);
+ }
+
# printk should use KERN_* levels. Note that follow on printk's on the
# same line do not need a level, so we use the current block context
# to try and find and validate the current printk. In summary the current
--
2.3.0
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index a27d38f5a464..dbfc93d40292 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -7015,10 +7015,8 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action,
>
> rcu_read_unlock_sched();
>
> - if (overflow) {
> - trace_printk("hotplug failed for cpu %lu", cpu);
> + if (overflow)
> return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
> - }
> }
> cpuset_update_active_cpus(false);
> break;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists