[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1428376220.3201.5.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 05:10:20 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nohz: make nohz_full imply isolcpus
On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 15:28 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 04/03/2015 11:43 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > Speaking of microsecond savers, the (ick) deferment experiment
> > below
> > cut 60 core jitter in half. Shooting the clocksource watchdog
> > fixes
> > alternating ~15us/~5us tick on my desktop box.
> >
> > With workqueue twiddles and whatnot floating around, the thing is
> > starting to look viable.
>
> Doesn't look too bad to me, though the changes below
> could probably use some comments when turned into a
> final patch :)
The watchdog yeah, the tick thing may want to become.. anything else.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists