[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150407213839.GJ10892@google.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 16:38:39 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, dja@...ens.net,
x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu@...au.co.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/30] PCI: Separate pci_host_bridge creation out of
pci_create_root_bus()
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 05:25:40PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> This patch separate pci_host_bridge creation out
> of pci_create_root_bus(), and try to make a generic
> pci_host_bridge, then we could make it hold host
> bridge specific operations like
> pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(). The changes are
> transparent to platform host bridge drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host-bridge.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 3 +
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
> index 39b2dbe..7d52a0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,58 @@
>
> #include "pci.h"
>
> +static void pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(dev);
> +
> + if (bridge->release_fn)
> + bridge->release_fn(bridge);
> +
> + pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->windows);
> + kfree(bridge);
> +}
> +
> +struct pci_host_bridge *pci_create_host_bridge(
> + struct device *parent, int domain, int bus,
> + struct list_head *resources)
> +{
> + int error;
> + struct pci_host_bridge *host;
> + struct resource_entry *window, *n;
> +
> + host = kzalloc(sizeof(*host), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!host)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + host->dev.parent = parent;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&host->windows);
> + resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(window, n, resources)
> + list_move_tail(&window->node, &host->windows);
> + /*
> + * If support CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC, use
> + * pci_host_assign_domain_nr() to update domain
> + * number.
> + */
> + host->domain = domain;
> + pci_host_assign_domain_nr(host);
I think it's a bit confusing that there's another "host->domain ="
assignment buried inside pci_host_assign_domain_nr(), so the first
assignment is overwritten when CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC is set.
Can you do something like this instead:
int pci_host_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_host_bridge *host, int domain)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
host->domain = pci_assign_domain_nr(host->dev.parent);
#else
host->domain = domain;
#endif
}
Then the alternatives (CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=y and
CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC being unset) are close together and right at the
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC, so no extra comments are needed.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists