| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-fffbb5dcfd29f8831e41b4dd2ab938bd36d35283@git.kernel.org> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:43:19 -0700 From: tip-bot for Denys Vlasenko <tipbot@...or.com> To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org Cc: keescook@...omium.org, fweisbec@...il.com, ast@...mgrid.com, dvlasenk@...hat.com, wad@...omium.org, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, bp@...en8.de, oleg@...hat.com, bp@...e.de, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, luto@...capital.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org Subject: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/64: Move opportunistic sysret code to syscall code path Commit-ID: fffbb5dcfd29f8831e41b4dd2ab938bd36d35283 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/fffbb5dcfd29f8831e41b4dd2ab938bd36d35283 Author: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> AuthorDate: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 18:46:59 +0200 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> CommitDate: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:02:12 +0200 x86/asm/entry/64: Move opportunistic sysret code to syscall code path This change does two things: Copy-pastes "retint_swapgs:" code into syscall handling code, the copy is under "syscall_return:" label. The code is unchanged apart from some label renames. Removes "opportunistic sysret" code from "retint_swapgs:" code block, since now it won't be reached by syscall return. This in fact removes most of the code in question. text data bss dec hex filename 12530 0 0 12530 30f2 entry_64.o.before 12562 0 0 12562 3112 entry_64.o Run-tested. Acked-and-Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427993219-7291-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S index 65485b3..e4c8103 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S @@ -354,8 +354,8 @@ GLOBAL(int_with_check) movl TI_flags(%rcx),%edx andl %edi,%edx jnz int_careful - andl $~TS_COMPAT,TI_status(%rcx) - jmp retint_swapgs + andl $~TS_COMPAT,TI_status(%rcx) + jmp syscall_return /* Either reschedule or signal or syscall exit tracking needed. */ /* First do a reschedule test. */ @@ -399,9 +399,86 @@ int_restore_rest: DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE) TRACE_IRQS_OFF jmp int_with_check + +syscall_return: + /* The IRETQ could re-enable interrupts: */ + DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_ANY) + TRACE_IRQS_IRETQ + + /* + * Try to use SYSRET instead of IRET if we're returning to + * a completely clean 64-bit userspace context. + */ + movq RCX(%rsp),%rcx + cmpq %rcx,RIP(%rsp) /* RCX == RIP */ + jne opportunistic_sysret_failed + + /* + * On Intel CPUs, SYSRET with non-canonical RCX/RIP will #GP + * in kernel space. This essentially lets the user take over + * the kernel, since userspace controls RSP. It's not worth + * testing for canonicalness exactly -- this check detects any + * of the 17 high bits set, which is true for non-canonical + * or kernel addresses. (This will pessimize vsyscall=native. + * Big deal.) + * + * If virtual addresses ever become wider, this will need + * to be updated to remain correct on both old and new CPUs. + */ + .ifne __VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT - 47 + .error "virtual address width changed -- SYSRET checks need update" + .endif + shr $__VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT, %rcx + jnz opportunistic_sysret_failed + + cmpq $__USER_CS,CS(%rsp) /* CS must match SYSRET */ + jne opportunistic_sysret_failed + + movq R11(%rsp),%r11 + cmpq %r11,EFLAGS(%rsp) /* R11 == RFLAGS */ + jne opportunistic_sysret_failed + + /* + * SYSRET can't restore RF. SYSRET can restore TF, but unlike IRET, + * restoring TF results in a trap from userspace immediately after + * SYSRET. This would cause an infinite loop whenever #DB happens + * with register state that satisfies the opportunistic SYSRET + * conditions. For example, single-stepping this user code: + * + * movq $stuck_here,%rcx + * pushfq + * popq %r11 + * stuck_here: + * + * would never get past 'stuck_here'. + */ + testq $(X86_EFLAGS_RF|X86_EFLAGS_TF), %r11 + jnz opportunistic_sysret_failed + + /* nothing to check for RSP */ + + cmpq $__USER_DS,SS(%rsp) /* SS must match SYSRET */ + jne opportunistic_sysret_failed + + /* + * We win! This label is here just for ease of understanding + * perf profiles. Nothing jumps here. + */ +syscall_return_via_sysret: + CFI_REMEMBER_STATE + /* r11 is already restored (see code above) */ + RESTORE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_R11 + movq RSP(%rsp),%rsp + USERGS_SYSRET64 + CFI_RESTORE_STATE + +opportunistic_sysret_failed: + SWAPGS + jmp restore_c_regs_and_iret CFI_ENDPROC END(system_call) + .macro FORK_LIKE func ENTRY(stub_\func) CFI_STARTPROC @@ -673,76 +750,8 @@ retint_swapgs: /* return to user-space */ DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_ANY) TRACE_IRQS_IRETQ - /* - * Try to use SYSRET instead of IRET if we're returning to - * a completely clean 64-bit userspace context. - */ - movq RCX(%rsp),%rcx - cmpq %rcx,RIP(%rsp) /* RCX == RIP */ - jne opportunistic_sysret_failed - - /* - * On Intel CPUs, sysret with non-canonical RCX/RIP will #GP - * in kernel space. This essentially lets the user take over - * the kernel, since userspace controls RSP. It's not worth - * testing for canonicalness exactly -- this check detects any - * of the 17 high bits set, which is true for non-canonical - * or kernel addresses. (This will pessimize vsyscall=native. - * Big deal.) - * - * If virtual addresses ever become wider, this will need - * to be updated to remain correct on both old and new CPUs. - */ - .ifne __VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT - 47 - .error "virtual address width changed -- sysret checks need update" - .endif - shr $__VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT, %rcx - jnz opportunistic_sysret_failed - - cmpq $__USER_CS,CS(%rsp) /* CS must match SYSRET */ - jne opportunistic_sysret_failed - - movq R11(%rsp),%r11 - cmpq %r11,EFLAGS(%rsp) /* R11 == RFLAGS */ - jne opportunistic_sysret_failed - - /* - * SYSRET can't restore RF. SYSRET can restore TF, but unlike IRET, - * restoring TF results in a trap from userspace immediately after - * SYSRET. This would cause an infinite loop whenever #DB happens - * with register state that satisfies the opportunistic SYSRET - * conditions. For example, single-stepping this user code: - * - * movq $stuck_here,%rcx - * pushfq - * popq %r11 - * stuck_here: - * - * would never get past 'stuck_here'. - */ - testq $(X86_EFLAGS_RF|X86_EFLAGS_TF), %r11 - jnz opportunistic_sysret_failed - - /* nothing to check for RSP */ - - cmpq $__USER_DS,SS(%rsp) /* SS must match SYSRET */ - jne opportunistic_sysret_failed - - /* - * We win! This label is here just for ease of understanding - * perf profiles. Nothing jumps here. - */ -irq_return_via_sysret: - CFI_REMEMBER_STATE - /* r11 is already restored (see code above) */ - RESTORE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_R11 - movq RSP(%rsp),%rsp - USERGS_SYSRET64 - CFI_RESTORE_STATE - -opportunistic_sysret_failed: SWAPGS - jmp restore_args + jmp restore_c_regs_and_iret /* Returning to kernel space */ retint_kernel: @@ -761,7 +770,12 @@ retint_kernel: * The iretq could re-enable interrupts: */ TRACE_IRQS_IRETQ -restore_args: + +/* + * At this label, code paths which return to kernel and to user, + * which come from interrupts/exception and from syscalls, merge. + */ +restore_c_regs_and_iret: RESTORE_C_REGS REMOVE_PT_GPREGS_FROM_STACK 8 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists