linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "staging: board: disable as it breaks the build"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150408004400.GA3456@verge.net.au>
Date:	Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:44:05 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "staging: board: disable as it breaks the
 build"

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:41:58PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> This reverts commit d13778d537a0ed6115d2a79a942af999cfb8eec6.
> >>
> >> Commit 13c11072536f2613 ("staging:board: remove unnecessary function")
> >> fixed the build of drivers/staging/board/board.c.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
> 
> Acked-by? Reviewed-by? Tested-by? Rejected-by?

To be honest I was flipping between Signed-off-by and Acked-by.
But it seems you don't think either of those would be appropriate.
So how about:

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/