linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Update weak barriers to use dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150408093032-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:42:55 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Update weak barriers to use dma_wmb/rmb

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 05:47:42PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> This change makes it so that instead of using smp_wmb/rmb which varies
> depending on the kernel configuration we can can use dma_wmb/rmb which for
> most architectures should be equal to or slightly more strict than
> smp_wmb/rmb.
> 
> The advantage to this is that these barriers are available to uniprocessor
> builds as well so the performance should improve under such a
> configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>

Well the generic implementation has:
#ifndef dma_rmb
#define dma_rmb()       rmb()
#endif

#ifndef dma_wmb
#define dma_wmb()       wmb()
#endif

So for these arches you are slightly speeding up UP but slightly hurting SMP -
I think we did benchmark the difference as measureable in the past.

Additionally, isn't this relying on undocumented behaviour?
The documentation says:
	"These are for use with consistent memory"
and virtio does not bother to request consistent memory
allocations.

One wonders whether these will always be strong enough.



> ---
>  include/linux/virtio_ring.h |   23 ++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> index 67e06fe18c03..8e50888a6d59 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> @@ -21,19 +21,20 @@
>   * actually quite cheap.
>   */
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  static inline void virtio_mb(bool weak_barriers)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	if (weak_barriers)
>  		smp_mb();
>  	else
> +#endif
>  		mb();
>  }
>  
>  static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers)
>  {
>  	if (weak_barriers)
> -		smp_rmb();
> +		dma_rmb();
>  	else
>  		rmb();
>  }
> @@ -41,26 +42,10 @@ static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers)
>  static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers)
>  {
>  	if (weak_barriers)
> -		smp_wmb();
> +		dma_wmb();
>  	else
>  		wmb();
>  }
> -#else
> -static inline void virtio_mb(bool weak_barriers)
> -{
> -	mb();
> -}
> -
> -static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers)
> -{
> -	rmb();
> -}
> -
> -static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers)
> -{
> -	wmb();
> -}
> -#endif
>  
>  struct virtio_device;
>  struct virtqueue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/