[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1428483228-5232-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:53:48 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] scripts/checkpatch: check for uses of trace_printk
Production kernels will scream if trace_printk() is used (thanks to
Steve's banner). Rather than waiting for that to happen, let's check
patches beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
Changes since v1:
o added an exception when the code is in kernel/trace/, as suggested
by Steve and Joe;
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index d124359..c36b2b7 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3257,6 +3257,13 @@ sub process {
"Prefer printk_ratelimited or pr_<level>_ratelimited to printk_ratelimit\n" . $herecurr);
}
+# check for uses of trace_printk
+ if ($realfile !~ m@...nel/trace/@ &&
+ $line =~ /\btrace_printk\s*\(/) {
+ ERROR("TRACE_PRINTK",
+ "Never use trace_printk in production code!\n" . $herecurr);
+ }
+
# printk should use KERN_* levels. Note that follow on printk's on the
# same line do not need a level, so we use the current block context
# to try and find and validate the current printk. In summary the current
--
2.3.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists