[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87iod756em.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:14:46 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
CC: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<ryusuke.sakato.bx@...esas.com>,
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
<hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@...esas.com>,
<takeshi.kihara.df@...esas.com>,
"Jaehoon Chung" <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
"Grégory Soutadé" <gsoutade@...tion.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] mmc: cast unsigned int to typeof(sector_t) to avoid unexpected error
Hi
> card->csd.capacity is defined as "unsigned int",
> and, sector_t is defined as "u64" or "unsigned long" (depends on CONFIG_LBDAF)
> sector_t data might have strange data if first bit of unsigned int
> was 1. this patch cast it to typeof(sector_t)
>
> ex) if sector_t was u64
>
> unsigned int data;
> sector_t sector;
>
> data = 0x80000000;
> sector = (data << 8); // 0xffffff8000000000
> sector = (((typeof(sector_t))data) << 8); // 0x8000000000
Sorry, I noticed this explain (= number of 0) was wrong
Maybe it should be
data = 0x800000;
sector = (data << 8); // 0xffffffff80000000
sector = (((typeof(sector_t))data) << 8); // 0x80000000
or
data = 0x80000000;
sector = (data << 8); // 0x0
sector = (((typeof(sector_t))data) << 8); // 0x8000000000
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists