lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552523CA.8040106@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Apr 2015 08:49:14 -0400
From:	Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Pengfei Yuan <0xcoolypf@...il.com>
CC:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why not build kernel with -O3

On 2015-04-08 08:19, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Pengfei Yuan <0xcoolypf@...il.com> wrote:
>> Could you please provide some examples that I can investigate?
>> Thanks!
>
> It would be awesome if you could find out which gcc optimizations
> cause the speed up.
> "gcc -c -Q -O3 --help=optimizers" will help you.
>
> Please also double check your results.
> You need do to multiple runs, etc...
> Especially the redis speed up looks odd. Does redis really spend that much time
> in the kernel?
>
My guess would be that much of the speed up is actually related to 
context switch handling and the scheduling/statistics related code.


Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (2967 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ