[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55252B6B.7040907@nod.at>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:21:47 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Pengfei Yuan <0xcoolypf@...il.com>
CC: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why not build kernel with -O3
Am 08.04.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Pengfei Yuan:
> 2015-04-08 20:19 GMT+08:00 Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Pengfei Yuan <0xcoolypf@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Could you please provide some examples that I can investigate?
>>> Thanks!
>>
>> It would be awesome if you could find out which gcc optimizations
>> cause the speed up.
>> "gcc -c -Q -O3 --help=optimizers" will help you.
>>
>
> This is really helpful.
> But I can only find very short description for each option from
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
Yeah, but if you know -fXY gives a nice speed up we can add it to our
CFLAGS if it makes sense and has not much downsides.
Blindly enabling -O3 can be dangerous as it might make the generated code
much bigger and the asm unreadable.
>> Please also double check your results.
>> You need do to multiple runs, etc...
>> Especially the redis speed up looks odd. Does redis really spend that much time
>> in the kernel?
>
> Redis is special among the six applications because it is single-threaded.
Still it would be nice to now much more about the load and why -O3 helps.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists