linux-kernel - [PATCH 03/19] tools lib traceevent: Honor operator priority

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed,  8 Apr 2015 11:23:23 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/19] tools lib traceevent: Honor operator priority

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>

Currently it ignores operator priority and just sets processed args as a
right operand.  But it could result in priority inversion in case that
the right operand is also a operator arg and its priority is lower.

For example, following print format is from new kmem events.

  "page=%p", REC->pfn != -1UL ? (((struct page *)(0xffffea0000000000UL)) + (REC->pfn)) : ((void *)0)

But this was treated as below:

  REC->pfn != ((null - 1UL) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0)

In this case, the right arg was '?' operator which has lower priority.
But it just sets the whole arg so making the output confusing - page was
always 0 or 1 since that's the result of logical operation.

With this patch, it can handle it properly like following:

  ((REC->pfn != (null - 1UL)) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0)

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1428298576-9785-10-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
[ Replaced 'swap' with 'rotate' in a comment as requested by Steve and agreed by Namhyung ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
index 6d31b6419d37..12a7e2a40c89 100644
--- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
+++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
@@ -1939,7 +1939,22 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
 			goto out_warn_free;
 
 		type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
-		arg->op.right = right;
+
+		if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
+		    get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
+			struct print_arg tmp;
+
+			/* rotate ops according to the priority */
+			arg->op.right = right->op.left;
+
+			tmp = *arg;
+			*arg = *right;
+			*right = tmp;
+
+			arg->op.left = right;
+		} else {
+			arg->op.right = right;
+		}
 
 	} else if (strcmp(token, "[") == 0) {
 
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/