[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYTpLKXRdeCVMkCnXmBg84HEsc0qzfPai5dFOnQ1G+ZVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:03:55 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: enable for ARC
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin
<Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com> wrote:
> From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
>
> Synopsys SDP platform uses DW GPIO controller in design with
> ARC cores. So adding ARC to architectures that may select this
> GPIO controller.
>
> Even though support for Synopsys SDP is yet to be submitted we'll need
> this tiny option enabled at least for properly working interrupts (DW
> GPIO controller is used as interrupt controller).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Patch applied.
But ...
> - depends on ((ARM || ARM64) && OF_GPIO) || X86_INTEL_QUARK
> + depends on ((ARC || ARM || ARM64) && OF_GPIO) || X86_INTEL_QUARK
This is getting a bit silly. What stops us from actually just enabling
it for any architecture?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists