[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5525992C.6090906@nod.at>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 23:10:04 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Chen Gang <xili_gchen_5257@...mail.com>, realmz6@...il.com
CC: adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blackfin: Makefile: Skip reloc overflow issue when COMPILE_TEST
enabled
Am 08.04.2015 um 23:05 schrieb Chen Gang:
> l1_text is at L1_CODE_START (e.g. for bf533, 0xff800000). If the kernel
> is too big, it may be overwritten, the related issue:
>
> LD init/built-in.o
> init/built-in.o: In function `do_early_param':
> init/main.c:(.init.text+0xe0): relocation truncated to fit: R_BFIN_PCREL24 against symbol `strcmp' defined in .l1.text section in arch/blackfin/lib/lib.a(strcmp.o)
> init/main.c:(.init.text+0x10e): relocation truncated to fit: R_BFIN_PCREL24 against symbol `strcmp' defined in .l1.text section in arch/blackfin/lib/lib.a(strcmp.o)
> init/built-in.o: In function `unknown_bootoption':
>
> blackfin is for embedded system, the size limitition is acceptable, so
> it is not the real world issue, which should be skipped if COMPILE_TEST
> enabled.
You're again papering over the real issue.
COMPILE_TEST is only one way to generate a too big kernel.
The right thing is to blow up and warn the user.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists