[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150408220808.GS2366@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:08:08 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, oleg@...hat.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] latched RB-trees and __module_address()
For the record I still think it's better to just look it up in the
kernel page tables, which already maintain that information. This is a much
simpler, much less risky patch. It works on all architectures that use page
tables for the kernel, and have a X bit in them. The rest are likely
obscure and won't have a lot of modules.
My patch implementing this for x86 is here:
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1410.1/01879.html
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists