linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 1/3] staging: dgnc: clean up allocation of ->channels[i]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:42:29 +0300
From:	Giedrius Statkevičius 
	<giedrius.statkevicius@...il.com>
To:	lidza.louina@...il.com, markh@...pro.net
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dan.carpenter@...cle.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	Giedrius Statkevičius 
	<giedrius.statkevicius@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] staging: dgnc: clean up allocation of ->channels[i]

Check if kzalloc fails in dgnc_tty_init() and if it does then free all
previously allocated ->channels[i] and set them to NULL. This makes the code
less error/bug prone because instead of needing programmers attention to add
checks everywhere we do that in one place. Also, remove a bogus comment and
check in the same loop because ->channels[i] isn't allocated anywhere else.
Finally, remove a unnecessary check if ->channels[i] is NULL in the next loop
because it can't be.

Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@...il.com>
---
v5: no change

v4: Make this patch only for dgnc_tty.c and only for this thing. Split into 3
patches (1 patch fixes a bug reported by Dan Carpenter)

v3: Remove the wrong comment at dgnc_tty_init() that says the allocation could
happen somewhere else before this and remove the check if (!brd->channels[i]).
Also, remove all checks where ->channels[i] is checked if it's NULL or not
because if probe fails then that means that this scenario isn't possible (except
in the ioctl).

v2: Only returning -ENOMEM if an allocation failed isn't enough as it was
spotted by Sudip so create a new label that frees all successfully allocated
stuff and only then returns -ENOMEM. Also, remove a unnecessary check in the
next loop.

 drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c
index ce4187f..0e48f95 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c
@@ -304,19 +304,15 @@ int dgnc_tty_init(struct dgnc_board *brd)

 	brd->nasync = brd->maxports;

-	/*
-	 * Allocate channel memory that might not have been allocated
-	 * when the driver was first loaded.
-	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < brd->nasync; i++) {
-		if (!brd->channels[i]) {
-
-			/*
-			 * Okay to malloc with GFP_KERNEL, we are not at
-			 * interrupt context, and there are no locks held.
-			 */
-			brd->channels[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(*brd->channels[i]), GFP_KERNEL);
-		}
+		/*
+		 * Okay to malloc with GFP_KERNEL, we are not at
+		 * interrupt context, and there are no locks held.
+		 */
+		brd->channels[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(*brd->channels[i]),
+					   GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!brd->channels[i])
+			goto err_free_channels;
 	}

 	ch = brd->channels[0];
@@ -324,10 +320,6 @@ int dgnc_tty_init(struct dgnc_board *brd)

 	/* Set up channel variables */
 	for (i = 0; i < brd->nasync; i++, ch = brd->channels[i]) {
-
-		if (!brd->channels[i])
-			continue;
-
 		spin_lock_init(&ch->ch_lock);

 		/* Store all our magic numbers */
@@ -375,6 +367,13 @@ int dgnc_tty_init(struct dgnc_board *brd)
 	}

 	return 0;
+
+err_free_channels:
+	for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
+		kfree(brd->channels[i]);
+		brd->channels[i] = NULL;
+	}
+	return -ENOMEM;
 }

-- 
2.3.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/