[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1428623611.22867.561.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:53:31 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@...escale.com>
CC: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@...escale.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mihai.caraman@...escale.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/kvm: Enable running guests on RT Linux
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 10:44 +0300, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
> So at this point I was getting kinda frustrated so I decided to measure
> the time spend in kvm_mpic_write and kvm_mpic_read. I assumed these were
> the main entry points in the in-kernel MPIC and were basically executed
> while holding the spinlock. The scenario was the same - 24 VCPUs guest,
> with 24 virtio+vhost interfaces, only this time I ran 24 ping flood
> threads to another board instead of netperf. I assumed this would impose
> a heavier stress.
>
> The latencies look pretty ok, around 1-2 us on average, with the max
> shown below:
>
> .kvm_mpic_read 14.560
> .kvm_mpic_write 12.608
>
> Those are also microseconds. This was run for about 15 mins.
What about other entry points such as kvm_set_msi() and
kvmppc_mpic_set_epr()?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists