linux-kernel - [PATCH] Speed up __run_timers() when jiffie gap is large

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1428566342-24571-1-git-send-email-mail.weber.wang@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu,  9 Apr 2015 03:59:02 -0400
From:	Wenbo Wang <mail.weber.wang@...il.com>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:	chong.yuan@...blaze.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wenbo Wang <wenbo.wang@...blaze.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Speed up __run_timers() when jiffie gap is large

From: Wenbo Wang <wenbo.wang@...blaze.com>

Signed-off-by: Wenbo Wang <wenbo.wang@...blaze.com>
Reviewed-by: Chong Yuan <chong.yuan@...blaze.com>

Currently __run_timers() increases jiffie by one in every loop. This is
very slow when the jiffie gap is large.

The following test is done on idle cpu 15 (isolated by isolcpus= kernel
option). There is a clocksource_watchdog timer expires in every 20s.

run_timer_softirq() (invokes __run_timers) takes 120+us to catch up jiffies.

[root@...alhost tracing]# cat trace_pipe
450.328663 |    15) ! 124.138 us  |  run_timer_softirq();
470.318675 |    15) ! 128.002 us  |  run_timer_softirq();
490.308875 |    15)               |  run_timer_softirq() {
490.309048 |    15) ! 164.647 us  |  }
510.299059 |    15)               |  run_timer_softirq() {
510.299230 |    15) ! 162.307 us  |  }

After applying this patch, the same softirq takes less than 20us to complete
the same work.

[root@...alhost tracing]# cat trace_pipe
430.058585 |    15) + 11.228 us   |  run_timer_softirq();
450.048683 |    15)   7.936 us    |  run_timer_softirq();
470.038760 |    15) + 19.443 us   |  run_timer_softirq();
490.028856 |    15) + 11.361 us   |  run_timer_softirq();
510.018953 |    15) + 10.085 us   |  run_timer_softirq();
530.009038 |    15) + 10.075 us   |  run_timer_softirq();
550.000242 |    15) + 10.958 us   |  run_timer_softirq();
---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 2d3f5c5..15da6a4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct tvec_base {
 	struct tvec tv3;
 	struct tvec tv4;
 	struct tvec tv5;
+	int tv1_cnt;	/* number of newly inserted timers in tv1 */
 } ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct tvec_base boot_tvec_bases;
@@ -363,6 +364,7 @@ __internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)
 	if (idx < TVR_SIZE) {
 		int i = expires & TVR_MASK;
 		vec = base->tv1.vec + i;
+		base->tv1_cnt++;
 	} else if (idx < 1 << (TVR_BITS + TVN_BITS)) {
 		int i = (expires >> TVR_BITS) & TVN_MASK;
 		vec = base->tv2.vec + i;
@@ -378,6 +380,7 @@ __internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)
 		 * or you set a timer to go off in the past
 		 */
 		vec = base->tv1.vec + (base->timer_jiffies & TVR_MASK);
+		base->tv1_cnt++;
 	} else {
 		int i;
 		/* If the timeout is larger than MAX_TVAL (on 64-bit
@@ -1174,6 +1177,7 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct tvec_base *base)
 		spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock);
 		return;
 	}
+
 	while (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->timer_jiffies)) {
 		struct list_head work_list;
 		struct list_head *head = &work_list;
@@ -1182,11 +1186,29 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct tvec_base *base)
 		/*
 		 * Cascade timers:
 		 */
-		if (!index &&
-			(!cascade(base, &base->tv2, INDEX(0))) &&
-				(!cascade(base, &base->tv3, INDEX(1))) &&
-					!cascade(base, &base->tv4, INDEX(2)))
-			cascade(base, &base->tv5, INDEX(3));
+		if (unlikely(!index)) {
+			if (!cascade(base, &base->tv2, INDEX(0))) {
+				if ((!cascade(base, &base->tv3, INDEX(1))) &&
+						!cascade(base, &base->tv4, INDEX(2)))
+					cascade(base, &base->tv5, INDEX(3));
+			}
+
+			/*
+			 * We are just crossing the boundary of tv1 (usually 256 jiffies).
+			 * Since there was no new timers inserted to tv1 and all the old
+			 * timers have been processed, it is guaranteed that tv1 has no
+			 * pending timers, so jiffie can jump to the next boundary at
+			 * most.
+			 */
+			if (base->tv1_cnt == 0) {
+				base->timer_jiffies += min_t(unsigned long,
+						TVR_SIZE - index, jiffies - base->timer_jiffies + 1);
+					continue;
+			}
+
+			base->tv1_cnt = 0;
+		}
+
 		++base->timer_jiffies;
 		list_replace_init(base->tv1.vec + index, head);
 		while (!list_empty(head)) {
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/