linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.4 167/176] sched/rt: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1428569224-23820-167-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu,  9 Apr 2015 16:46:55 +0800
From:	lizf@...nel.org
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...advisors.com>,
	Suruchi Kadu <suruchi.a.kadu@...el.com>,
	Doug Nelson <doug.nelson@...el.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 167/176] sched/rt: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target

From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>

3.4.107-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


commit 80e3d87b2c5582db0ab5e39610ce3707d97ba409 upstream.

This patch adds checks that prevens futile attempts to move rt tasks
to a CPU with active tasks of equal or higher priority.

This reduces run queue lock contention and improves the performance of
a well known OLTP benchmark by 0.7%.

Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...advisors.com>
Cc: Suruchi Kadu <suruchi.a.kadu@...el.com>
Cc: Doug Nelson<doug.nelson@...el.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421430374.2399.27.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/sched/rt.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 526c77d..71429db 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1293,7 +1293,12 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
 	    (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
 		int target = find_lowest_rq(p);
 
-		if (target != -1)
+		/*
+		 * Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
+		 * not running a lower priority task.
+		 */
+		if (target != -1 &&
+		    p->prio < cpu_rq(target)->rt.highest_prio.curr)
 			cpu = target;
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1570,6 +1575,16 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
 
 		lowest_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
+		if (lowest_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr <= task->prio) {
+			/*
+			 * Target rq has tasks of equal or higher priority,
+			 * retrying does not release any lock and is unlikely
+			 * to yield a different result.
+			 */
+			lowest_rq = NULL;
+			break;
+		}
+
 		/* if the prio of this runqueue changed, try again */
 		if (double_lock_balance(rq, lowest_rq)) {
 			/*
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/