[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1504091054410.3845@nanos>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:58:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: Replace cpu_base->active_bases with a direct
check of the active list
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Plus, look at this code in hrtimer_run_queues():
>
> for (index = 0; index < HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; index++) {
> base = &cpu_base->clock_base[index];
> if (!base->active.next)
> continue;
>
> if (gettime) {
> hrtimer_get_softirq_time(cpu_base);
> gettime = 0;
> }
>
> if at least one base is active (on my fairly standard system all cpus
> have at least one active hrtimer base all the time - and many cpus
> have two bases active), then we run hrtimer_get_softirq_time(), which
> dirties the cachelines of all 4 clock bases:
>
> base->clock_base[HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME].softirq_time = xtim;
> base->clock_base[HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC].softirq_time = mono;
> base->clock_base[HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME].softirq_time = boot;
> base->clock_base[HRTIMER_BASE_TAI].softirq_time = tai;
This is the non highres case and we actually could optimize that case
as well to avoid the cache line polution.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists