linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/4] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:29:33 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc:	Luca Abeni <lucabe72@...il.com>, henrik@...tad.us,
	juri.lelli@...il.com, raistlin@...ux.it, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation update

On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:19:16AM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
> On 04/09/2015 11:17 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:13:10AM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
> >>Ok; so how should I proceed? Should I address the various comments (by you, Juri
> >>and Henrik) by sending incremental patches based on these ones (since I see you queued
> >>these patches), or should I resend everything after addressing the various comments?
> >
> >Whichever you prefer, if you'd like to just respin these patches that's
> >fine, I'll drop them -- but let me know before they end up in a git tree
> >;-)
> Ok; given Henrik's comments, I suspect it is better to respin the patches.
> I hope to resend everything in few days.

OK, I'll await new and shiny patches :-) Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/