linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: Prefer firmware values when determining whether a port is removable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:31:30 +0200
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...eos.com>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: Prefer firmware values when determining whether
 a port is removable

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 04:36:00PM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Windows appears to pay more attention to the ACPI values than any hub
> configuration, so prefer the firmware's opinion on whether a port is
> fixed or removable before falling back to the hub values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...eos.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

I like your trust in firmware :)

Anyway, is this all a Windows 8 requirement?  If so, I'll feel
comfortable making these changes, otherwise we are at the mercy of the
bios people to randomly get things right, and we all know how often that
works...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/