[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150409032759.GA18247@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:27:59 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86/numa: kernel stack corruption fix
On 04/08/15 at 11:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/08/15 at 10:41am, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> > >> Hi Dave,
> > >>
> > >> I made a mistake, when numa is on, numa_meminfo is from SRAT, but it will be cut
> > >> in numa_cleanup_meminfo(), so the bug is not related to numa on/off. Your comment
> > >> is right.
> > >
> > > Hi Xishi,
> > >
> > >>From code flow it's exact as you said. And if remove numa=off bug should
> > > be reproduced alwasy. I talked to Dave, he said error didn't occur when
> > > he remove numa=off. That is too weird.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Baoquan,
> >
> > May be it wrote over end of numa mask bitmap, but the stack can still run,
> > so there is no Call Trace.
> > How about add some printk to see if it has written over?
>
> Oops, Redhat kdump always add numa=off in 2nd kernel commandline, but I did
> not notice I removed it during test.
>
> So yes, the issue does not depend on numa=off.
OK, got it. thanks. Ack this patch.
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Thanks
Baoquan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists