linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.4 051/176] drm/vmwgfx: Don't use memory accounting for kernel-side fence objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1428569224-23820-51-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu,  9 Apr 2015 16:44:59 +0800
From:	lizf@...nel.org
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 051/176] drm/vmwgfx: Don't use memory accounting for kernel-side fence objects

From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>

3.4.107-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


commit 1f563a6a46544602183e7493b6ef69769d3d76d9 upstream.

Kernel side fence objects are used when unbinding resources and may thus be
created as part of a memory reclaim operation. This might trigger recursive
memory reclaims and result in the kernel running out of stack space.

So a simple way out is to avoid accounting of these fence objects.
In principle this is OK since while user-space can trigger the creation of
such objects, it can't really hold on to them. However, their lifetime is
quite long, so some form of accounting should perhaps be implemented in the
future.

Fixes kernel crashes when running, for example viewperf11 ensight-04 test 3
with low system memory settings.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@...are.com>
Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@...are.com>
[lizf: Backported to 3.4: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c | 21 ++-------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
index 7e07433..051ca79 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
@@ -485,14 +485,7 @@ void vmw_fence_obj_flush(struct vmw_fence_obj *fence)
 
 static void vmw_fence_destroy(struct vmw_fence_obj *fence)
 {
-	struct vmw_fence_manager *fman = fence->fman;
-
 	kfree(fence);
-	/*
-	 * Free kernel space accounting.
-	 */
-	ttm_mem_global_free(vmw_mem_glob(fman->dev_priv),
-			    fman->fence_size);
 }
 
 int vmw_fence_create(struct vmw_fence_manager *fman,
@@ -500,20 +493,12 @@ int vmw_fence_create(struct vmw_fence_manager *fman,
 		     uint32_t mask,
 		     struct vmw_fence_obj **p_fence)
 {
-	struct ttm_mem_global *mem_glob = vmw_mem_glob(fman->dev_priv);
 	struct vmw_fence_obj *fence;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = ttm_mem_global_alloc(mem_glob, fman->fence_size,
-				   false, false);
-	if (unlikely(ret != 0))
-		return ret;
-
 	fence = kzalloc(sizeof(*fence), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (unlikely(fence == NULL)) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out_no_object;
-	}
+	if (unlikely(fence == NULL))
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	ret = vmw_fence_obj_init(fman, fence, seqno, mask,
 				 vmw_fence_destroy);
@@ -525,8 +510,6 @@ int vmw_fence_create(struct vmw_fence_manager *fman,
 
 out_err_init:
 	kfree(fence);
-out_no_object:
-	ttm_mem_global_free(mem_glob, fman->fence_size);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/