linux-kernel - Re: simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:21:43 +0300
From:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<shc_work@...l.ru>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
	Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform

On 09/04/15 14:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2015-04-07 14:19:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>>> I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
>>> in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
>>>
>>> root@...abuibui:~# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
>>> real               0m 0.00s
>>> user               0m 0.00s
>>> sys                0m 0.00s
>>>
>>> on 3.18, this takes 220msec. Similar slowdown exists for
>>> writes. Simple framebuffer did not change at all between 3.15 and
>>> 3.18; resource flags of the framebuffer are still same (0x200).
>>>
>>> If I enable caching on 3.18, it speeds up a bit, to 70msec or
>>> so... Which means problem is not only in caching.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>> My first guess was  commit 67dc0d4758e5 ("vt_buffer: drop console buffer
>> copying optimisations"), but this was introduced only in v4.0-rc1.
>>
>> Just in case you encounter another performance regression after upgrading
>> to a more modern kernel ;-)
> 
> :-). I did a git bisect, and it pointed to this. And reverting it
> indeed fixes the problem in 3.18. Problem is still there in 4.0.

Interesting. I can reproduce this also on TI's AM437x board, on 3.14
kernel. Without the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.01s
user    0m 0.00s
sys     0m 0.01s

With the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.19s
user    0m 0.01s
sys     0m 0.17s

> Archit do you know what is going on there? Should the revert be filled
> for 4.0?

(Cc'ing Archit's new email)

> 
> 								Pavel
> 
> commit 981409b25e2a99409b26daa67293ca1cfd5ea0a0
> Author: Archit Taneja <archit@...com>
> Date:   Fri Nov 16 14:46:04 2012 +0530
> 
>     fbdev: arm has __raw I/O accessors, use them in fb.h
> 
>     This removes the sparse warnings on arm platforms:
> 
>     warning: cast removes address space of expression
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@...com>
>  Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
>  Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
>  Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
>  Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)