linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: arm: introduce kvm_arch_setup/clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150409125607.GD3212@hawk.usersys.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:56:07 +0200
From:	Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
To:	David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
	marc.zyngier@....com, peter.maydell@...aro.org, agraf@...e.de,
	pbonzini@...hat.com, zhichao.huang@...aro.org,
	jan.kiszka@...mens.com, r65777@...escale.com, bp@...e.de,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: arm: introduce kvm_arch_setup/clear_debug()

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:28:55PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > This is a precursor for later patches which will need to do more to
> > setup debug state before entering the hyp.S switch code. The existing
> > functionality for setting mdcr_el2 has been moved out of hyp.S and now
> > uses the value kept in vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2.
> > 
> > This also moves the conditional setting of the TDA bit from the hyp code
> > into the C code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
> > 
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 41008cd..8c01c97 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -242,5 +242,7 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> >  static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> >  static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> >  static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {}
> > +static inline void kvm_arch_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > +static inline void kvm_arch_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> 
> Do you really want to call these functions "kvm_arch.." although they are not
> defined for other arch and not triggered by common code?
>

Agreed. If other arches want something similar we can rename/refactor
later. If these are arm-only functions, then we don't need the generic
prefix, which is actually even a bit confusing.

drew 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/