[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55267A23.2040007@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:39:55 +0530
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
hbabus@...ibm.com
CC: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, geoff@...radead.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, david.griego@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel
Hi Takahiro,
On Thursday 26 March 2015 01:58 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Crash dump kernel will access memory regions in system kernel via
> copy_oldmem_page(), which reads a page with ioremap'ing it assuming that
> such pages are not part of main memory of crash dump kernel.
> This is true under non-UEFI environment because kexec-tools modifies
> a device tree adding "usablemem" attributes to memory sections.
> Under UEFI, however, this is not true because UEFI remove memory sections
> in a device tree and export all the memory regions, even though they belong
> to system kernel.
>
> So we should add "mem=X[MG]" boot parameter to limit the meory size and
> avoid hitting the following assertion in ioremap():
> if (WARN_ON(pfn_valid(__phys_to_pfn(phys_addr))))
> return NULL;
Well I am using your updated kexec-tool which has support of automatic
addition of "mem=" parameter. I found that this warning is still
appearing and therefore another error about "Kdump: vmcore not initialized".
Memory address for which ioremap failed was almost at the top of
crash_reserved_mem. So I modified kexec-tool [1] to accept user specific
mem= parameter with a value lesser than physical location which was
being remapped, however still the warning was there.
Further I noticed that there is no reserved memblock with nonzero
memblock_region->size when early_mem -> memblock_enforce_memory_limit is
called. Therefore this mem= param is not limiting memory location in my
case.
I was just wondering, why do not we use ioremap_cache instead of ioremap
in copy_oldmem_page?
~Pratyush
[1]
https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/7dc38d587cb32d4522f6baf035d09eeaf71c5105
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists