linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: replace GFP_ATOMIC by GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55268DCB.3010201@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 09 Apr 2015 16:33:47 +0200
From:	Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: replace GFP_ATOMIC by GFP_KERNEL



On 09/04/2015 14:36, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Oh.  They're not GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fold these two patches together into one patch and resend.
The reason I did it that way is because I feel that the two patches 
really are different.
The first one do not change the execution of the code but the second one 
does.
Could you explain to me why they can be folded into one ?

regards,
Quentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/