linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] clk: tegra: Fix duplicate const for parent names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150409152826.GB18835@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 08:28:26 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] clk: tegra: Fix duplicate const for parent names

On 04/09, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 2015-04-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>:
> > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:22:15PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >> Replace duplicated const keyword for 'emc_parent_clk_names' with proper
> > >> array of const pointers to const strings.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c | 2 +-
> > >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > This would probably better go in via the Tegra tree since the patch that
> > > contains this has only made it to linux-next.
> > >
> > > Stephen, Mike, any objections to me taking this?
> > 
> > Applying this without the change for const-ness of parent_names (patch
> > by Sascha Hauer sent before mine [1]) would introduce a warning -
> > assign of const to non-const. Any idea to solve it? Immutable branch?
> 
> Right, I had missed that. Immutable branch would work, though perhaps
> it'd be easier to just defer this until after v4.1-rc1. The warning
> shouldn't happen if we leave out this single patch and apply it later
> on, right?
> 
> Alternatively the whole series could be deferred until after v4.1-rc1.
> 

Yeah I don't really care to make an immutable branch for this
cleanup series. If everyone is ok with waiting until after -rc1
we can apply the Tegra patch then (or you can and we'll get it
through a pull later). We should be able to apply the parts that
go through clk tree though.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/