| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1428597466-8154-3-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 12:37:42 -0400
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
To: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, acme@...radead.org, eranian@...gle.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH V6 2/6] perf, x86: introduce setup_pebs_sample_data()
From: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
move codes that setup PEBS sample data to separate function.
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 7c6dd8e..e3916d5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -845,8 +845,10 @@ static inline u64 intel_hsw_transaction(struct pebs_record_hsw *pebs)
return txn;
}
-static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
- struct pt_regs *iregs, void *__pebs)
+static void setup_pebs_sample_data(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct pt_regs *iregs, void *__pebs,
+ struct perf_sample_data *data,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_HSW_PREC \
(PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW | \
@@ -858,30 +860,25 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
*/
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
struct pebs_record_hsw *pebs = __pebs;
- struct perf_sample_data data;
- struct pt_regs regs;
u64 sample_type;
int fll, fst, dsrc;
int fl = event->hw.flags;
- if (!intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event))
- return;
-
sample_type = event->attr.sample_type;
dsrc = sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC;
fll = fl & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT;
fst = fl & (PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST | PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_HSW_PREC);
- perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, event->hw.last_period);
+ perf_sample_data_init(data, 0, event->hw.last_period);
- data.period = event->hw.last_period;
+ data->period = event->hw.last_period;
/*
* Use latency for weight (only avail with PEBS-LL)
*/
if (fll && (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT))
- data.weight = pebs->lat;
+ data->weight = pebs->lat;
/*
* data.data_src encodes the data source
@@ -894,7 +891,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
val = precise_datala_hsw(event, pebs->dse);
else if (fst)
val = precise_store_data(pebs->dse);
- data.data_src.val = val;
+ data->data_src.val = val;
}
/*
@@ -907,58 +904,70 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
* PERF_SAMPLE_IP and PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN to function properly.
* A possible PERF_SAMPLE_REGS will have to transfer all regs.
*/
- regs = *iregs;
- regs.flags = pebs->flags;
- set_linear_ip(®s, pebs->ip);
- regs.bp = pebs->bp;
- regs.sp = pebs->sp;
+ *regs = *iregs;
+ regs->flags = pebs->flags;
+ set_linear_ip(regs, pebs->ip);
+ regs->bp = pebs->bp;
+ regs->sp = pebs->sp;
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR) {
- regs.ax = pebs->ax;
- regs.bx = pebs->bx;
- regs.cx = pebs->cx;
- regs.dx = pebs->dx;
- regs.si = pebs->si;
- regs.di = pebs->di;
- regs.bp = pebs->bp;
- regs.sp = pebs->sp;
-
- regs.flags = pebs->flags;
+ regs->ax = pebs->ax;
+ regs->bx = pebs->bx;
+ regs->cx = pebs->cx;
+ regs->dx = pebs->dx;
+ regs->si = pebs->si;
+ regs->di = pebs->di;
+ regs->bp = pebs->bp;
+ regs->sp = pebs->sp;
+
+ regs->flags = pebs->flags;
#ifndef CONFIG_X86_32
- regs.r8 = pebs->r8;
- regs.r9 = pebs->r9;
- regs.r10 = pebs->r10;
- regs.r11 = pebs->r11;
- regs.r12 = pebs->r12;
- regs.r13 = pebs->r13;
- regs.r14 = pebs->r14;
- regs.r15 = pebs->r15;
+ regs->r8 = pebs->r8;
+ regs->r9 = pebs->r9;
+ regs->r10 = pebs->r10;
+ regs->r11 = pebs->r11;
+ regs->r12 = pebs->r12;
+ regs->r13 = pebs->r13;
+ regs->r14 = pebs->r14;
+ regs->r15 = pebs->r15;
#endif
}
if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 2) {
- regs.ip = pebs->real_ip;
- regs.flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
- } else if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(®s))
- regs.flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
+ regs->ip = pebs->real_ip;
+ regs->flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
+ } else if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(regs))
+ regs->flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
else
- regs.flags &= ~PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
+ regs->flags &= ~PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
if ((sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR) &&
x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 1)
- data.addr = pebs->dla;
+ data->addr = pebs->dla;
if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 2) {
/* Only set the TSX weight when no memory weight. */
if ((sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT) && !fll)
- data.weight = intel_hsw_weight(pebs);
+ data->weight = intel_hsw_weight(pebs);
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION)
- data.txn = intel_hsw_transaction(pebs);
+ data->txn = intel_hsw_transaction(pebs);
}
if (has_branch_stack(event))
- data.br_stack = &cpuc->lbr_stack;
+ data->br_stack = &cpuc->lbr_stack;
+}
+
+static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct pt_regs *iregs, void *__pebs)
+{
+ struct perf_sample_data data;
+ struct pt_regs regs;
+
+ if (!intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event))
+ return;
+
+ setup_pebs_sample_data(event, iregs, __pebs, &data, ®s);
if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s))
x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists