[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150409165242.GB20669@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:52:43 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: bindings: add
abracon,abx80x
Hi,
On 09/04/2015 at 15:25:23 +0200, Philippe De Muyter wrote :
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> when I look into Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc, it seems that
> all rtc but a few (mainly old ones) have the "-rtc" suffix in the
> "compatible" property.
>
> Would it not be better to keep it here also, like what I had written ?
>
No, they have that suffix because they are RTC IPs part of a SoC so the
chosen compatible is <soc>-rtc. In the case of the abracon RTC, it would
be redundant.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists