[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150409170733.GR21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:07:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] nohz: add tick_nohz_full_cpumask_or() and
_andnot() APIs
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 01:00:38PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> +static inline void tick_nohz_full_cpumask_or(struct cpumask *mask)
This still reads as if you're doing: nohz_full_mask |= mask.
I think the suggestion done by Frederic is the right one, reverse the
lot, have:
isolcpu_map_or(nohz_full_map) := isolcpus_map |= nohz_full_map
Or just completely give up and just write readable code under an #ifdef.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists