linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: Replace cpu_base->active_bases with a direct check of the active list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150409065730.GK27490@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 08:57:30 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: Replace cpu_base->active_bases with a direct
 check of the active list

On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:28:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Btw., does cpu_base->active_bases even make sense? hrtimer bases are 
> fundamentally percpu, and to check whether there are any pending 
> timers is a very simple check:
> 
> 	base->active->next != NULL
> 

Yeah, that's 3 pointer dereferences from cpu_base, iow you traded a
single bit test on an already loaded word for 3 potential cacheline
misses.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/