linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 13/15] pvqspinlock: Only kick CPU at unlock time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:06:01 -0400
From:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@...il.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 13/15] pvqspinlock: Only kick CPU at unlock time

On 04/09/2015 03:57 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:55:48PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> @@ -219,24 +236,30 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node)
>>   }
>>
>>   /*
>> + * Called after setting next->locked = 1&  lock acquired.
>> + * Check if the the CPU has been halted. If so, set the _Q_SLOW_VAL flag
>> + * and put an entry into the lock hash table to be waken up at unlock time.
>>    */
>> -static void pv_kick_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node)
>> +static void pv_scan_next(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> I'm not too sure about that name change..

It is because the function will no longer kick the cpu. So I change the 
name to reflect that. I am not good at naming. Please let me know if you 
have a better name.

Cheers,
Longman

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/