[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150409223709.GF53918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:37:09 -0700
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: Topology updates and NUMA-level sched domains
On 08.04.2015 [12:32:01 +0200], Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 07/04/2015 21:41, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
> > No, that's very much not the same. Even if it were dealing with hotplug
> > it would still assume the cpu to return to the same node.
> >
> > But mostly people do not even bother to handle hotplug.
> >
>
> You said userspace assumes the cpu<->node relation is a boot-time fixed
> one, and hotplug breaks this. How do you expect userspace to handle
> hotplug? Is there a convenient way to be notified when a CPU (or memory)
> is unplugged?
There is some mention of "User Space Notification" in cpu-hotplug.txt,
but no idea if it's current.
-Nish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists