[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150410072448.GA28074@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:24:48 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] x86: mce: kexec: switch MCE handler for kexec/kdump
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 04:07:26AM +0000, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> ... wait, changing cpu_online_mask might confuse admins who try to
> analyze the kdump, especially when the problems causing panic are CPU
> related issues?
Well, if you're offlining the CPUs before doing the dump, you're already
changing the system, aren't you? So why lie to people?
> In the similar way, changing tolerant value loses the original value,
> although this is unlikely to be a problem. But if we change it, using
> an upper bit to keep lowest 2 bit to save the original value is better?
I don't think that you need to do that - you can see from the original
kernel's dmesg whether an MCE happened - we're normally very vocal. If
the user tried to deliberately suppress that, then that's her fault
only.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists