[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150410112430.GB12732@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:24:31 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
Cc: 'Gregory Fong' <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"vishnu.ps@...sung.com" <vishnu.ps@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: print cma-reserved pages from show_mem
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 01:18:04PM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > [ 12.212102] active_anon:734 inactive_anon:1189 isolated_anon:0
> > [ 12.212102] active_file:0 inactive_file:0 isolated_file:0
> > [ 12.212102] unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
> > [ 12.212102] free:254104 slab_reclaimable:82 slab_unreclaimable:843
Here, we have 82 pages reclaimable, which is 328kB, and 843 unreclaimable
which is 3372kB, which is a total of 925 pages.
> > [ 12.212102] mapped:429 shmem:1815 pagetables:13 bounce:0
> > [ 12.212102] free_cma:4032
> > [ 12.243172] DMA free:754080kB min:3472kB low:4340kB high:5208kB
> > active_anon:180kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB
> > unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:778240kB
> > managed:759252kB mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB
> > shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:328kB slab_unreclaimable:3372kB
Which agrees here.
> > [ 12.401609] 834 slab pages
but not here... this is an interesting difference, because in the ARM
version of show_mem(), we count the actual number of pages where
PageSlab() returns true. Can slab pages also be reserved pages or
swap cache pages? I thought they were exclusive of those. So, the
question comes... why the difference in accounting, and which one is
correct.
Maybe there's a bug in the accounting somewhere...
So I think we're not ready for this patch to be merged yet.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists