[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8790947.ikOtIjWHkt@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:02:39 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: add KASan support
On Friday 10 April 2015 13:48:52 Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 04/09/2015 11:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 March 2015 17:49:04 Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> >> arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>
> >
> > Just one very high-level question: as this code is clearly derived from
> > the x86 version and nontrivial, could we move most of it out of
> > arch/{x86,arm64} into mm/kasan/init.c and have the rest in some header
> > file?
> >
>
> I think most of this could be moved out from arch code, but not everything.
> E.g. kasan_init() function is too arch-specific.
Right, makes sense. So presumably, populate_zero_shadow could become a global
function by another name, and possibly also handle registering the die
handler, so you can call it from an architecture specific kasan_init()
function, right?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists